Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: CAPD is one of a few therapy that can be used to replace the kidney function. A good patient perception of CAPD can increase the self-efficacy of patients undergoing CAPD. The majority of CAPD patients are HD patients who have a perceived experience of both physical and psychological discomfort. The research objective was to determine the relation between perceptions of CAPD measures and self-efficacy in patients undergoing CAPD. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional approach. The number of samples of 75 respondents was selected by consecutive sampling technique. Results: The logistic regression test results show that there is a relation between perceptions of CAPD measures and self-efficacy in patients undergoing CAPD with the confounding variable that affected by social support. Conclusions: Nurses need to improve their abilities when assessing patient perceptions and increasing the role of social support, so that the information obtained becomes the basis for increasing self-efficacy in patients undergoing CAPD.

Keywords

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Perception Self-Efficacy

Article Details

How to Cite
Gamayana, Y. . ., Yulia, Y., & Sukmarini, L. . (2021). THE RELATION BETWEEN PATIENTS’ PERCEPTION OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (CAPD) AND SELF-EFFICACY IN PATIENTS WITH CAPD. JURNAL KEPERAWATAN CIKINI, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55644/jkc.v2i1.53

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy:Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press (4), 71-81
  2. Black, J.M., & Hawks, J.H. (2009). Medical Surgical Nursing: Clinical Management for Positive Outcome. (8thed). St. Louis: Missouri. Elsevier Saunders.
  3. Blame, S., Petersen, N., & Wray, N. (2008). Variation in hemodialysis patient compliance according to demographics. Social Science Medicine, 37(8), 1035-1043.
  4. Chiang, C. K., Peng, Y. S., Chiang, S. S., Yang, C. S., He, Y. H., Hung, K. Y., et al. (2004). Health-related quality of life of hemodialysis patients in Taiwan: A multicenter study. Blood Purification, 22, 490–498.
  5. Charonko, C. (2010). Cultural influences in noncompliance behavior and decision making. Holistic Nursing Practice, 7(2), 73 - 78.
  6. Collins, AJ, Hao W & Xia H, et al. (2006). Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis, 34:1065–1074
  7. Gencoz, T & Astan, G. (2006). Social support locus of control and depressive symptoms in dialysis patients. Scand J Psychol. 47: 203-8
  8. Landreneau, K. J., & Ward, P. (2007). Perceptions of Adults Patients on Hemodialysis Concerning Choice Among Renal Replacement Therapies, 34(5)
  9. Muranaka, N. N. Y. (2013). Views of Japanese patients on the advantages and disadvantages of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, 1145–1158. doi:10.1007/s11255-012-0322-x
  10. Prodjosudjadi, W, Suhardjono, A. (2009). The Development of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Program In Indonesia, Peritoneal Dialysis International, volume 28, S59 - S62
  11. Rayyani, M., Malekyan, L., Forouzi, M. A., & Haghdoost, A. (2014). Self-care Self-efficacy and Quality of Life among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in South-East of Iran, 4, 165–171
  12. Sukandar, E. (2006). Nefrologi Klinik ed 3. Bagian Ilmu Penyakit Dalam. Fakultas Kedokteran UNPAD. Bandung
  13. Sanjeev, K., & Vandana, S. (2001). Self Assessed Quality of Life in Peritoneal Dialysis Patient, Am J Nephrol, Divison Of Nephrology and Hypertension, Winthrop University Hospital, USA, 21: 215-220.
  14. Theofilou, P. (2012). Self-esteem in Greek Dialysis Patients, 6(2), 136-141
  15. Wenger, N. S., Lynn, J., Oye, R. K., Liu, H., Teno, J. M., Phillips, R. S., Desbiens, N. A., Sehgal, A., Kussin, P., Taub, H., Harrell, F., & Rnaus, W. (2000). Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Patient factors and documentation associated with dialysis decisions. Journal o f the American Geriatrics Society, 48(Suppl), S75-83